| Area |
City/town |
Population (approx.) |
Density |
Income |
Quality of Schools |
Crime level |
Property tax (%) |
Personal Income tax |
Comments |
| Core urban |
Des Moines |
~216,000 |
High urban |
Medium (median HH income low–mid $60k) |
Mixed – GreatSchools mostly 3–7; stronger pockets on west/south sides |
Higher than suburbs; concentrated in a few central and east‑side neighborhoods |
Roughly 1.8–2.1% of market value (varies by school district) |
None (only Iowa state income tax) |
Most diverse housing stock; older homes; strongest rental market; ongoing infill and redevelopment |
| Western suburb |
West Des Moines |
~75,000 |
Suburban, moderate–high |
High (median HH income mid–high $80k) |
Generally strong – GreatSchools roughly 6–9 in Waukee, West Des Moines, Van Meter districts |
Low–moderate; significantly below Des Moines |
About 1.8–2.2%; some of highest absolute tax bills due to values |
None |
Major retail (Jordan Creek), office and medical hub; strong new construction, townhomes and apartments |
| North suburb |
Ankeny |
~75,000 |
Suburban, moderate–high, expanding north and east |
High (median HH income high $80k–low $90k) |
Generally strong – GreatSchools about 6–9 |
Low; family‑oriented suburb |
Around 2.0–2.3% |
None |
One of fastest‑growing cities; heavy single‑family and townhome building; good long‑term demand |
| NW inner suburbs |
Urbandale / Clive / Johnston |
Each ~18,000–47,000 |
Suburban, leafy, mostly built‑out core with some greenfield edges |
High (median HH income often $85k–$100k+) |
Strong – GreatSchools around 7–9 (Urbandale, WDM, Waukee, Johnston districts) |
Low; stable owner‑occupied areas |
Around 1.9–2.3% |
None |
Established neighborhoods, good schools, strong move‑up buyer demand |
| Far‑west growth corridor |
Waukee |
~30,000 |
Suburban, fast‑growing new subdivisions |
High (median HH income ~$100k+) |
Very strong – GreatSchools often 7–10 |
Very low |
About 2.0–2.4% |
None |
Top price and appreciation area; large pipeline of lots; strong demand from families and professionals |
| East suburb |
Altoona |
~20,000 |
Suburban, moderate density |
Medium–high (median HH income around $80k) |
Moderate–strong – GreatSchools about 5–8 |
Low–moderate |
Around 2.0–2.3% |
None |
More affordable new construction; close to entertainment (Adventureland, casino) and I‑80 corridor |
| South suburbs |
Norwalk / Indianola / Carlisle |
~11,000–16,000 each |
Suburban / exurban, lower density |
Medium (median HH income roughly $70k–$85k) |
Mixed‑to‑good – GreatSchools about 5–8 |
Low |
Around 1.8–2.2% |
None |
Value‑oriented single‑family; commuter towns with room to expand |
| Rural / small towns |
Adel, Winterset, etc. |
5,000–10,000 each |
Low density |
Medium (often $60k–$75k) |
Moderate – GreatSchools about 4–7 |
Low |
Often under 2.0% |
None |
More volatile demand; land availability but slower absorption and limited amenities |
To view all table columns, please open this table on a laptop or desktop screen.
| Area |
Appreciation potential |
Risk |
Key drivers |
| Waukee and far‑west suburbs (Grimes, western Clive/WDM) |
High |
Moderate |
Rapid population and income growth; top‑tier schools; strong new‑construction pipeline; limited long‑term land in core areas; higher price point may be sensitive to economic downturns.
|
| Ankeny and north corridor |
High |
Moderate |
One of fastest‑growing cities; diversified employment access; strong schools; mix of owner‑occupant and rental demand; risk from oversupply in some segments if building outpaces demand.
|
| West Des Moines (especially near Jordan Creek and medical/office hubs) |
Medium‑High |
Low‑Moderate |
Established suburban employment center; high incomes; strong retail and amenities; slightly slower relative appreciation vs. emerging suburbs but very stable; office‑space trends a mild risk.
|
| Urbandale / Clive / Johnston |
Medium‑High |
Low |
Built‑out, desirable neighborhoods; strong schools; good access to jobs; limited new supply inside city limits supports prices; appreciation more steady than explosive.
|
| Altoona and east corridor |
Medium |
Moderate |
Affordable entry into metro; logistics and entertainment employment; good for cash‑flow‑oriented rentals; appreciation depends on continued industrial growth and managing traffic/infrastructure strain.
|
| South suburbs (Norwalk, Indianola, Carlisle) |
Medium |
Moderate |
Value proposition for commuters; room for growth; appeal to families wanting more space; somewhat longer commute and perception of distance limit top‑end price growth; good long‑term hold.
|
| Des Moines – stable neighborhoods (west, south, some north areas) |
Medium‑High |
Moderate |
Older homes with solid bones; walkable areas; strong rental demand and decent owner‑occupant interest; good balance of cash flow and appreciation; risk tied to local school perception and crime spillover.
|
| Des Moines – challenged neighborhoods (parts of central/east) |
Low‑Medium |
High |
Lowest acquisition prices and highest potential yields; upside if targeted reinvestment, infrastructure, and crime reduction succeed; higher vacancy, management and rehab risk; more sensitive to economic downturns.
|
| Rural and small towns in Dallas, Warren, Madison counties |
Low‑Medium |
Moderate‑High |
Lower land and home costs; slower population growth and thinner buyer pool; demand reliant on commuting and small local employers; best suited to long‑term holds or niche strategies (acreage, specialty rentals).
|
To view all table columns, please open this table on a laptop or desktop screen.