Property Makler
Advanced analytics for residential real estate investing

Dubai, UAE US

   

Dubai   US   Market Research  

Fayetteville, NC housing market

Housing market indicators

Indicator 2022202320242025* Change202220232024YTD
Median Listing Price per Square Feet $146 $154 $158 $155 20.7% 5.5% 2.6% -1.9%
Active Listing Count 659 960 1,391 1,482 59.2% 45.7% 44.9% 6.5%
Median Days on Market 53 51 62 59 12.8% -3.8% 21.6% -4.8%
Share of listings with price increase 1.2% 1.4% 1.4% 1.1%
Share of listings with price decrease 5.8% 9.5% 12.2% 15.8%

* last available value

Home prices

Short term housing supply drivers

Long term housing demand drivers

Long term housing supply drivers




Note: 12M MA - 12 months moving average, Permits - New Private Housing Structures Authorized by Building Permits. Source: FRED

Housing market overview

Fayetteville, NC MSA – Geographic Scope and Key Areas

Area City/town Population Density Income (high/low/…) Quality of Schools Crime level Property tax (%) Personal Income tax Comments
Central MSA Fayetteville ≈210,000 (city) Urban, moderate density Low‑to‑moderate; median HH income mid‑$50Ks Mixed; GreatSchools typically 3‑7/10 with strong magnets and weak neighborhood schools Higher than U.S. average; significant variation by neighborhood ≈1.0 – 1.2% effective (county + city combined varies by location) None (no local income tax; only NC state tax) Largest job base; wide price spectrum; strong renter share; military presence stabilizes demand
South suburbs Hope Mills ≈18,000 – 19,000 Suburban, moderate Moderate; slightly above Fayetteville in many tracts Elementary/middle often 5‑8/10; some high schools 4‑6/10 Moderate; generally lower than central Fayetteville, but hotspots exist ≈1.0% (Cumberland County rates) None Popular for commuters; family‑oriented subdivisions, relatively affordable SFR supply
North / NE suburbs Eastover, Wade, Linden, Stedman Small towns, generally <4,000 each, plus rural surroundings Low‑to‑very low density Low‑to‑moderate; mix of working‑class and middle‑income households Schools generally 4‑7/10; fewer options but some stable community schools Lower than city core; rural property crime pockets ≈0.9 – 1.1% None Exurban feel; more land, manufactured housing and small farms; slower appreciation but cheap entry prices
Base‑adjacent Spring Lake ≈12,000 – 13,000 Urban‑suburban, compact Low‑to‑lower‑middle income Several schools 2‑5/10; reputational challenges Relatively high; concentrated property and violent crime in some tracts ≈1.1% None Very strong renter and military‑linked demand; depressed prices but volatile
West / Fort Liberty fringe Unincorporated Cumberland near Fort Liberty Not separately counted; part of metro 390K+ Low‑to‑moderate density subdivisions Moderate; large share of enlisted/officer households and base‑support workers Ranges 4‑8/10; some sought‑after schools drawing military families Moderate; transient population, but many stable cul‑de‑sac neighborhoods ≈1.0 – 1.2% None Core single‑family rental market; benefits directly from base staffing levels and BAH trends
Hoke County core Raeford ≈5,000 – 6,000 (town); >50,000 in county Low density, small‑town Low‑to‑moderate; lower than Cumberland on average Schools mostly 3‑6/10, with incremental improvement in some recent years Generally moderate; lower violent crime rates than Fayetteville city but some property crime ≈0.9 – 1.0% None Exurban alternative for buyers seeking land and lower prices; slower but steady absorption
To view all table columns, please open this table on a laptop or desktop screen.

Citizens – Income and Education

Key Economic Sectors

Housing Buying Market – Supply Drivers

Housing Buying Market – Demand Drivers

Key Challenges in the Housing Market

Investment Potential by Area/Region

Area Appreciation potential Risk Key drivers
Central Fayetteville (selected infill neighborhoods like Haymount, downtown‑adjacent) Moderate‑to‑High Medium Proximity to jobs and amenities, limited infill supply, older homes for value‑add, downtown revitalization efforts, but crime and school perceptions limit upside in some blocks
Broad Fayetteville city (average neighborhoods) Moderate Medium‑to‑High (sub‑market dependent) Stable but modest income growth, substantial rental share, crime and school variability, adequate but not tight supply; appreciation likely tracks inflation plus modest real gains
Hope Mills and southern suburbs Moderate‑to‑High Medium Family‑oriented subdivisions, relatively better schools, strong demand from military and local workers, room for new construction; risk from overbuilding and exposure to regional employment shocks
Northern/NE exurbs (Eastover, Wade, Linden, Stedman) Low‑to‑Moderate (price level) / Moderate (yield) Low‑to‑Medium Lower entry prices, more land and rural appeal, slower population growth but stable; good for cash‑flow‑oriented investors more than aggressive appreciation plays
Spring Lake and base‑adjacent older stock High (selective) but volatile High Very strong rental demand tied to Fort Liberty, attractive cap rates and BRRR opportunities, but elevated crime, property management intensity, and heavy reliance on federal policy
Fort Liberty fringe subdivisions (unincorporated Cumberland) Moderate‑to‑High Medium Consistent PCS inflows, strong VA/BAH‑driven buyer pool, relatively new housing stock; risk concentrated in base downsizing or policy changes
Raeford / Hoke County suburbs Moderate Medium Exurban growth as buyers seek land and affordability, some spillover from Fort Liberty staff and Fayetteville workers; appreciation steady but not rapid, sensitive to commuting costs and infrastructure
Inner‑city distressed neighborhoods (older multifamily and small SFR clusters) High (if revitalization succeeds) / Low (baseline) Very High Low acquisition cost and potential upside from targeted redevelopment, but severe crime, weak schools, high vacancy/turnover, and uncertain policy support make this a speculative niche
To view all table columns, please open this table on a laptop or desktop screen.



Property Makler © 2026  Contacts  T&C  About