Property Makler
Advanced analytics for residential real estate investing

Jackson, MS housing market

Housing market indicators

Indicator	2022	2023	2024	2025*	2022	2023	2024	YTD
Median Listing Price per Square Feet	$144	$141	$151	$152	22%	-2.1%	7.1%	0.7%
Active Listing Count	1,130	1,494	1,731	1,850	73.6%	32.2%	15.9%	6.9%
Median Days on Market	71	70	84	74	42%	-1.4%	20%	-11.9%
Share of listings with price increase	0.9%	0.8%	0.6%	0.6%
Share of listings with price decrease	12.1%	17.7%	17.3%	16.7%

* last available value

Home prices

Short term housing supply drivers

Long term housing demand drivers

Long term housing supply drivers

Note: 12M MA - 12 months moving average, Permits - New Private Housing Structures Authorized by Building Permits. Source: FRED

Housing market overview

Jackson, MS MSA – Overview and Geography

Jackson, MS MSA currently has roughly 600k residents, with slow to slightly negative net growth and modest overall density.
MSA counties: Hinds, Madison, Rankin, Copiah, Simpson.
Core urban core: City of Jackson (Hinds County, parts in Rankin and Madison), older inner suburbs like Clinton, Pearl, Richland, Ridgeland.
Affluent northern / northeastern suburbs: Madison, Gluckstadt, Canton (selected areas), parts of Ridgeland and northeast Jackson corridors.
Eastern / southeastern suburbs: Brandon, Flowood, Pearl, Richland – airport and logistics corridor, newer retail, medical and office clusters.
Outer small towns / exurban areas: Florence, Terry, Byram, Crystal Springs, Magee, Mendenhall, rural parts of Copiah and Simpson Counties.
MSA is bisected by I‑55 (north–south) and I‑20 (east–west), with Pearl River running through Jackson and Rankin County.

Cities / Towns – Population, Income, Schools, Crime, Taxes

Area	City / Town	Population (approx.)	Density (people / sq. mi.)	Income level	Quality of schools (GreatSchools – rough range)	Crime level	Property tax (typical effective % of home value)	Personal income tax (local)	Comments
Urban core	Jackson	≈150k	≈1,400	Low–moderate (median HH ≈$40k, pockets lower)	Wide range 2–8; selective magnets and a few strong elementaries, many low‑rated neighborhood schools	High – among highest violent and property crime in the MSA	≈0.9–1.1% effective (Hinds County + city)	None (state tax only)	Aging housing stock, infrastructure and water issues, strong public‑sector and medical employment, significant population outflow to suburbs.
Inner suburb – west	Clinton	≈28k	≈900	Moderate (median HH ≈$60k–$70k)	Generally 6–9; well‑regarded district, stable test scores	Low–moderate; significantly lower than Jackson, higher than far exurbs	≈0.8–1.0%	None	College town (Mississippi College), older but stable subdivisions, good value vs Madison / Rankin, solid owner‑occupancy.
Northern suburb – affluent	Madison	≈28k–30k	≈1,000	High (median HH often $100k+)	Mostly 8–10; among top in state	Low; one of the safest cities in MS	≈0.8–1.0%	None	High‑end master‑planned subdivisions, strong HOA controls, tight zoning, premium pricing and strong resale demand.
Northern suburb	Ridgeland	≈24k	≈1,600	Moderate–high (median HH ≈$65k–$75k, mix of renters and owners)	5–9; some highly rated schools in Madison County district	Low–moderate; pockets of higher multifamily‑related crime	≈0.9–1.0%	None	Major retail and office cluster, multi‑family nodes, strong access to I‑55, mixed product from Class A condos to older apartments.
Newer northern suburb	Gluckstadt	≈4k–6k (fast‑growing)	Suburban–low	High (newer move‑up and upper‑middle income households)	8–10 (served by Madison County schools)	Low	≈0.8–1.0%	None	New city, rapid subdivision and commercial growth, strong demand for new construction on larger lots.
County seat – north	Canton	≈12k	≈700	Low–moderate	3–7; mixed outcomes between city and county schools	Moderate	≈0.9–1.0%	None	Historic square, auto manufacturing legacy nearby, mix of older housing and rural‑fringe new builds.
Eastern suburb / airport corridor	Flowood	≈10k	≈800	Moderate–high (median HH ≈$75k+)	6–9; Rankin County schools generally strong	Low–moderate; commercial‑area incidents but residential pockets stable	≈0.8–0.9%	None	Retail, medical, and office hub near airport, newer subdivisions and townhomes, strong demand from professionals.
Eastern suburb	Brandon	≈26k	≈600	Moderate–high (many middle‑income homeowners)	7–9; Brandon schools widely regarded as strong	Low	≈0.8–0.9%	None	Family‑oriented bedroom community, steady new construction, limited multifamily, tight inventory.
Eastern inner suburb	Pearl	≈27k	≈1,100	Moderate (median HH ≈$55k–$60k)	6–8; solid but less elite than Madison / Brandon	Moderate; lower than Jackson, higher than outer Rankin	≈0.8–0.9%	None	Proximity to I‑20, retail and minor‑league ballpark, mix of older and newer subdivisions, good affordability.
Southern suburb	Byram	≈12k	≈500	Moderate (emerging middle‑income households)	4–7; improving but still mixed ratings	Moderate	≈0.9–1.0%	None	Relatively new city capturing south‑Jackson outmigration, lower prices with suburban lot sizes.
Southern small town	Terry / Florence / Crystal Springs (representative)	Each ≈3k–7k	Low (exurban / semi‑rural)	Low–moderate	3–7; varies by specific school and district	Low–moderate	≈0.7–0.9%	None	Rural character, lower price points, mix of older stock and scattered new construction, longer commute to job centers.

To view all table columns, please open this table on a laptop or desktop screen.

Citizens – Income and Education

Metro median household income: mid‑$50k to low‑$60k, with high dispersion between affluent suburbs and lower‑income Jackson neighborhoods.
Income pattern:
- Highest: Madison, Gluckstadt, parts of Ridgeland, Flowood, Brandon.
- Middle: Pearl, Clinton, many Rankin County communities, Byram.
- Lowest: Large parts of Jackson proper, some small towns in Copiah and Simpson Counties.
Education attainment:
- Metro: roughly one‑quarter to one‑third of adults with bachelor’s or higher.
- Suburban north / east (Madison, Ridgeland, Flowood, Brandon, parts of Clinton): well above metro average in college and graduate degrees.
- Jackson: mix of highly educated professionals around medical, government and universities with large share of residents with high school or some college only.
- Outer rural counties: lower bachelor’s attainment, more blue‑collar and service employment.
Demographic structure:
- Racially diverse metro with large Black majority in Jackson and more mixed / White‑leaning in many suburbs.
- Median age slightly below national average; family‑heavy in Madison and Rankin, older in some rural areas.

Key Economic Sectors

Government and public administration
- State capital functions, state agencies, courts, corrections, and local government operations anchor thousands of stable jobs.
Healthcare and life sciences
- Major institutions: University of Mississippi Medical Center, large hospitals and specialty clinics, growing outpatient and medical office presence particularly in Jackson, Flowood, Ridgeland.
Education
- Universities and colleges: Jackson State University, Millsaps, Belhaven, Mississippi College (Clinton), community colleges.
- These drive rental demand, faculty / staff housing, and off‑campus student markets.
Manufacturing and industrial
- Automotive and related manufacturing near Canton; additional light manufacturing and distribution in Rankin and Hinds industrial parks.
Logistics, warehousing, and transportation
- Interstate crossroads (I‑20, I‑55) plus Jackson‑Medgar Evers International Airport support logistics hubs, e‑commerce warehousing and regional distribution.
Retail, services, and hospitality
- Concentrated in Ridgeland (I‑55 corridor), Flowood (Dogwood, Lakeland), Pearl (outlets, stadium), and Madison corridors.
Energy and utilities, construction, and professional services
- Steady base tied to infrastructure, private development, and state / local government work.

Housing Market – Supply Drivers

Zoning and land‑use openness
- Madison and many Rankin suburbs: more restrictive zoning, strong design standards and lot requirements; favors higher‑end, lower‑density product, limits rapid supply growth.
- Jackson: more permissive in theory but constrained by infrastructure, demand, and lending concerns; many infill lots and redevelopment opportunities but slower execution.
- Outer towns / counties: relatively flexible zoning, available land, but weaker demand and infrastructure economics slow large‑scale development.
Regulatory strictness and permitting
- Suburban jurisdictions often business‑friendly but with detailed subdivision and architectural standards that add time and soft costs.
- Jackson: regulatory process can be slower and complicated by aging infrastructure, code enforcement, and political uncertainties.
Land availability
- Significant greenfield land remains in Madison, Gluckstadt, Rankin County fringes and rural counties.
- Closer‑in areas (Ridgeland, much of Madison city, Pearl, Flowood) have fewer large tracts; new supply increasingly comes from phased subdivisions and townhome infill.
Construction workforce cost and capacity
- Labor costs lower than national average, but pool of skilled trades is limited; surges in demand (e.g., large subdivisions) can push up bids and lead times.
- Materials pricing volatility affects feasibility of entry‑level product; builders often target mid‑range and move‑up price points instead.
Infrastructure and utilities
- Jackson’s water and sewer issues have impaired investor confidence and driven some households toward suburbs.
- Suburban infrastructure generally newer and more reliable, though expansion of roads and schools is a constraint in fastest‑growing corridors.
Financing environment
- Regional and local banks play major roles; cautious underwriting within Jackson city limits and some rural areas due to market and collateral risk.
- Suburban projects with strong pre‑sales and school districts often receive more favorable financing.

Housing Market – Demand Drivers

Migration patterns
- Net out‑migration from City of Jackson to Madison and Rankin Counties driven by schools, crime, and infrastructure concerns.
- Slow overall metro population growth, with modest in‑migration from rural Mississippi and small towns to job centers.
- Limited inflow from other states; metro is not a major national magnet compared to Sunbelt peers.
Growing industries
- Healthcare and medical research: expanding hospital systems, outpatient centers, and specialty practices; supports demand for professional‑class housing in Jackson, Flowood, Ridgeland, Madison, Brandon.
- Logistics / warehousing: growth along interstate and airport corridors; supports blue‑ and gray‑collar rental demand in Pearl, Flowood, south / west Jackson fringes.
- Education and government: stable rather than rapidly growing, but provide long‑term base for ownership and rental markets.
Declining or pressured sectors
- Some traditional manufacturing is flat or slowly declining, affecting certain exurban and rural labor markets and limiting high‑end housing demand there.
- Retail transitions away from older malls toward power centers and mixed‑use nodes; older retail corridors in Jackson lose some economic pull.
Affordability
- Home prices generally below national median; metro remains relatively affordable for first‑time buyers.
- However, high mortgage rates and construction costs make truly entry‑level new construction scarce; strong demand for sub‑$250k existing homes in suburbs.
Tenure and product mix
- High owner‑occupancy in Madison, Brandon, Clinton, many Rankin areas; supports stable values but keeps for‑sale inventory tight.
- Higher rental share in Jackson, parts of Ridgeland and Pearl; strong investor activity in value‑add single‑family and small multifamily.

Key Challenges in the Housing Market

Infrastructure and governance in Jackson
- Water, sewer and road issues undermine confidence, depress prices in some neighborhoods, and make financing and insurance more difficult.
- Perceptions of mismanagement reduce outside investor interest in large‑scale infill or redevelopment.
Crime and safety concerns
- High crime rates in parts of Jackson damp owner‑occupant demand and push families to suburbs, limiting appreciation in affected neighborhoods.
- Security costs and risk premiums increase operating costs for multifamily and SFR investors in higher‑crime zones.
School quality disparities
- Strong divergence between top suburban districts (Madison, Rankin, select Clinton schools) and many Jackson schools.
- Drives concentrated demand and price premiums in high‑rated catchments, while leaving other areas with stagnant or declining values.
Limited broad‑based population growth
- Regional population is mostly stable; appreciation is driven more by intra‑metro shifts than by large new inflows.
- This caps long‑term upside compared to high‑growth Sunbelt MSAs.
Economic concentration and wage levels
- Heavy reliance on government and healthcare provides stability but not rapid wage growth.
- Lower average incomes constrain price ceilings and luxury absorption outside top suburbs.
Older housing stock and deferred maintenance
- Many Jackson neighborhoods have aging homes requiring significant rehab; financing for small investors can be challenging.
- Code issues and tax liens add complexity to distressed and value‑add strategies.
Insurance and climate risk
- Storm and flood‑related risks in selected areas increase insurance costs and can impact affordability and lender willingness.

Investment Potential by Area / Region

Area	Appreciation potential	Risk	Key drivers
Madison (city) and Gluckstadt	High (relative to metro)	Low–moderate	Top‑tier schools, low crime, strong incomes. Limited supply due to zoning and land constraints. Consistent demand from professionals and families.
Ridgeland (single‑family and townhome areas)	Moderate–high	Moderate	Retail / office employment center with good access. Desirable schools (Madison County) in many zones. Some oversupply / turnover in older apartments increases micro‑market risk.
Flowood and Brandon	Moderate–high	Low–moderate	Growing retail, medical and service employment around airport and Lakeland corridor. Strong Rankin County schools and family demand. Room for continued subdivision development without severe congestion (for now).
Pearl	Moderate	Moderate	Good commuter location with improving amenities. More affordable than Madison / Brandon, attracting first‑time buyers. Moderate crime and older stock create bifurcated submarkets.
Clinton	Moderate–high	Low–moderate	Stable college‑anchored economy (Mississippi College). Good schools and established neighborhoods. Limited large tracts for rapid new supply supports price stability.
Byram and south‑Jackson fringe	Moderate (select pockets higher)	Moderate–high	Affordable suburban product drawing price‑sensitive households. School quality and crime perceptions remain mixed, creating volatility. Upside tied to successful community branding and infrastructure improvements.
City of Jackson – stable neighborhoods (e.g., Fondren, Belhaven, select North Jackson)	High (for well‑selected blocks)	High	Historic character, proximity to medical centers and universities. Active renovation and infill investors. Risks from citywide infrastructure, crime, governance, and flight to suburbs.
City of Jackson – distressed neighborhoods	Low–moderate (price‑driven)	Very high	Very low entry prices and high nominal rent yields. Significant risks: crime, code issues, delinquent taxes, collections, vacancy. Appreciation heavily dependent on policy, infrastructure, and broader perception shifts.
Canton and nearby industrial corridor	Moderate	Moderate	Industrial and auto‑related employment support workforce housing demand. Mixed school performance and modest incomes limit top‑end price growth. Potential upside with any re‑investment in manufacturing and logistics.
Outer rural towns (Copiah and Simpson Counties)	Low–moderate	Moderate	Very low land and home prices; low liquidity and slow sales cycles. Limited job growth; dependence on commuting to Jackson / suburbs. Best suited for long‑term hold, niche rural, or owner‑finance strategies.

To view all table columns, please open this table on a laptop or desktop screen.

Overall Analytical Takeaways

Metro‑wide appreciation is modest, but specific suburban corridors (Madison, Gluckstadt, Flowood, Brandon, select Ridgeland and Clinton areas) show durable, above‑average performance driven by schools, safety, and amenities.
Jackson itself is a highly segmented market: targeted infill and historic‑neighborhood investments can outperform, while many distressed areas are income‑oriented and highly speculative.
Supply is structurally limited in the most desirable suburbs by zoning and land constraints, while demand is reinforced by intra‑metro migration and school quality gaps.
For risk‑adjusted returns, investors typically favor quality suburban single‑family and small multifamily; higher‑yield but higher‑risk strategies concentrate in selected Jackson neighborhoods and certain workforce corridors.