![]() |
Property Makler
Advanced analytics for residential real estate investing | ||||||||
|
Dubai, UAE US |
| Indicator | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025* | Change | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | YTD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median Listing Price per Square Feet | $300 | $310 | $318 | $329 | -1.6% | 3.3% | 2.6% | 3.5% | |
| Active Listing Count | 1,423 | 1,101 | 1,412 | 1,716 | 140% | -22.6% | 28.2% | 21.5% | |
| Median Days on Market | 82 | 71 | 74 | 70 | 64% | -13.4% | 4.2% | -5.4% | |
| Share of listings with price increase | 1.1% | 0.9% | 0.9% | 0.9% | |||||
| Share of listings with price decrease | 21.5% | 17.4% | 17.8% | 19.9% | |||||
| Area | City/town | Population | Density | Income | Quality of Schools | Crime level | Property tax (%) | Personal Income tax | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Urban core | Reno | ≈281,000 (city est.) | High – about 2,000+ / sq.mi. | Mixed – low to upper‑middle; wide range by neighborhood | Varied – GreatSchools mostly 4–8/10, with some 2–3/10 in older core, 8–9/10 in suburbs | Above U.S. avg in central areas (property, vehicle crime); lower in outer suburbs | ≈0.6–0.8% effective (Nevada has 3% annual increase cap) | None (no city or county personal income tax) | Largest job center; strong rental demand; big intra‑city variation in values and risk |
| Urban core | Sparks | ≈112,000 | High – contiguous with Reno | Mostly middle‑income; some lower‑income older stock | Generally 4–7/10; newer subdivisions slightly higher | Moderate – somewhat lower violent crime than central Reno, some property‑crime hotspots | ≈0.6–0.8% | None | Historically more affordable than Reno; strong blue‑collar and logistics workforce |
| Suburban valley | Spanish Springs (CDP) | ≈17,000–20,000 | Low‑to‑moderate suburban density | Middle to upper‑middle | Many schools 6–8/10 | Lower than Reno/Sparks averages | ≈0.6–0.8% | None | Family‑oriented single‑family subdivisions; commute‑dependent, limited transit |
| Suburban valley | South Meadows / Damonte Ranch (Reno) | ≈25,000–30,000 (combined areas) | Suburban | Upper‑middle | Schools often 7–9/10 | Relatively low | ≈0.6–0.8% | None | Master‑planned communities; strong owner‑occupancy; newer stock; high buyer demand |
| Suburban valley | North Valleys (Stead, Lemmon, Golden Valley, Cold Springs) | ≈35,000–40,000 (aggregate) | Low‑to‑moderate | Lower‑middle to middle | Mostly 3–6/10 | Higher property crime than outer suburbs, mixed by pocket | ≈0.6–0.8% | None | Historically more affordable; near industrial/logistics jobs; some infrastructure and flood‑risk concerns |
| Lake Tahoe area | Incline Village / Crystal Bay | ≈9,000 | Low | High – affluent, second‑home and high‑net‑worth owners | Schools often 7–9/10 (small district, strong outcomes) | Low | ≈0.6–0.8%; high absolute bills due to very high values | None | Luxury/resort sub‑market; highly supply‑constrained; sensitive to high‑end and remote‑work cycles |
| State capital basin | Carson City | ≈59,000 (2020) | Moderate | Lower‑middle to middle; government and service‑sector base | Varied – ~3–8/10 depending on campus | Moderate, often lower than central Reno | ≈0.6–0.8% | None | More affordable ownership; stable public‑sector employment; lower growth but less volatility |
| Area | Appreciation potential | Risk | Key drivers |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reno – central urban core (Midtown, Downtown, UNR area) | Medium‑to‑High | Medium‑to‑High |
• Infill and densification opportunities (small multifamily, mixed‑use). • Strong rental demand from students, young professionals, hospitality workers. • Higher exposure to crime, economic volatility, and homelessness issues. • Regulatory and political risk around short‑term rentals and land use. |
| Reno – South Meadows / Damonte Ranch / Double Diamond | High | Medium |
• Family‑oriented master‑planned communities with good schools. • Easy access to major employment centers and airport. • Land constraints compared with further‑out suburbs; continued in‑migration of higher‑income households. • Some sensitivity to cyclical white‑collar job markets. |
| Reno – Caughlin Ranch / ArrowCreek / Somersett (upper‑end hill communities) | Medium‑to‑High | Medium |
• Attractive to move‑up buyers and remote professionals; golf and amenity focus. • Supply constrained by topography and design controls. • Above‑average price point may slow appreciation in downturns but offers scarcity value long term. • Wildland‑urban interface and insurance costs are non‑trivial risks. |
| Sparks – core city | Medium | Medium |
• Historically more affordable than Reno; draw for workforce tied to logistics and manufacturing. • Steady rental demand; solid cash‑flow potential in older SFR and small multifamily. • Some neighborhoods face aging infrastructure and moderate crime. • Appreciation tied closely to blue‑collar wage growth and industrial cycle. |
| Sparks – Spanish Springs / Wingfield Springs | Medium‑to‑High | Medium |
• Suburban family demand; relatively newer housing stock. • Good access to employment via Pyramid Highway corridor (with congestion caveats). • Room for additional subdivision build‑out moderates price spikes but supports steady growth. • Infrastructure and commute‑time issues are primary risks. |
| North Valleys (Stead, Lemmon, Golden Valley, Cold Springs) | Medium | Medium‑to‑High |
• Proximity to industrial and logistics jobs; strong tenant pool for workforce rentals. • Historically lower buy‑in costs and better cash‑flow potential than South Reno. • Higher exposure to environmental (flooding in some pockets), infrastructure, and reputational issues. • Appreciation tied to successful mitigation of flood/traffic concerns and continued industrial growth. |
| Incline Village / Crystal Bay (Lake Tahoe Nevada side) | High (long‑term, but volatile) | High |
• Severe supply constraints and luxury/second‑home demand; strong long‑run scarcity value. • Beneficiary of tax migration and high‑net‑worth remote workers. • Very sensitive to high‑end economic cycles, equity markets, and second‑home sentiment. • Regulatory and environmental constraints plus wildfire/insurance risks add complexity. |
| Carson City | Medium | Low‑to‑Medium |
• Stable state‑government and healthcare employment base. • Generally more affordable than Reno/Sparks; attractive for retirees and price‑sensitive buyers. • Slower growth trajectory; less speculative upside but lower volatility. • Limited large‑scale high‑wage employer growth caps appreciation potential. |
| Rural‑fringe areas (Verdi, Washoe Valley, outlying ranch properties) | Medium‑to‑High (very location‑specific) | Medium‑to‑High |
• Low supply of acreage and estate‑style properties; valued by lifestyle and high‑income buyers. • Infrastructure, well/septic, and wildfire considerations can deter some buyers. • Appreciation driven by amenity value rather than broad‑based wage growth. • Liquidity risk higher; properties may sit longer on market in downturns. |