 |
Property Makler
Advanced analytics for residential real estate investing | ||||||||
|
Dubai, UAE US |
Dubai US Market Research
Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA housing market
Housing market indicators
| Indicator | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025* | Change | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | YTD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median Listing Price per Square Feet | $316 | $335 | $338 | $336 | 7.5% | 6% | 0.9% | -0.6% | |
| Active Listing Count | 10,044 | 8,338 | 11,076 | 12,825 | 108% | -17% | 32.8% | 15.8% | |
| Median Days on Market | 66 | 59 | 66 | 63 | 46.7% | -10.6% | 11.9% | -4.5% | |
| Share of listings with price increase | 2.1% | 2.1% | 1.8% | 1.4% | |||||
| Share of listings with price decrease | 15.8% | 13.5% | 14.7% | 17.1% | |||||
| Employees, thousands | 1,692 | 1,718 | 1,741 | 1,700 | 2.2% | 1.6% | 1.3% | -2.4% | |
| Permits | 1,720 | 1,119 | 1,102 | 1,116 | 28.6% | -34.9% | -1.5% | 1.3% | |
* last available value
Home prices
Short term housing supply drivers
Long term housing demand drivers
Long term housing supply drivers
Note: 12M MA - 12 months moving average, Permits - New Private Housing Structures Authorized by Building Permits. Source: FRED
Housing market overview
Cities and key areas in Riverside–San Bernardino–Ontario, CA MSA
- MSA population about 4.7–4.8 million; covers all of Riverside County and San Bernardino County (Inland Empire).
- Core subregions:
• Western Inland Empire – Riverside, San Bernardino, Ontario, Corona, Moreno Valley, Rancho Cucamonga, Fontana, Riverside–Corona corridor.
• High Desert – Victorville, Hesperia, Apple Valley, Adelanto, Barstow.
• Coachella Valley – Palm Springs, Palm Desert, Indio, Coachella, La Quinta, Cathedral City.
• Pass & Hemet–San Jacinto – Beaumont, Banning, Hemet, San Jacinto.
• South/West Riverside growth belt – Temecula, Murrieta, Menifee, Lake Elsinore, Wildomar, Canyon Lake. - Population figures and densities are rounded 2024–2025 estimates; property tax is typical effective rate, which can vary by neighborhood and assessment.
| Area | City/town | Population (approx.) | Density (people/sq mi, approx.) | Income level | Quality of schools (GreatSchools range, typical) | Crime level (relative) | Property tax (effective %) | Personal income tax | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Western IE Core | Riverside | ~325,000 | ~4,100 | Middle | Mixed 3–8 | Moderate | 1.1–1.4 | None (city/county add-on) | Historic core; strong university/healthcare; diverse housing stock. |
| Western IE Core | San Bernardino | ~225,000 | ~3,900 | Low–middle | Mostly 2–6 | High | 1.1–1.4 | None | Lower prices; fiscal and crime challenges; some infill/warehouse growth. |
| Logistics/airport belt | Ontario | ~185,000 | ~3,500 | Middle | 3–7 | Moderate | 1.1–1.4 | None | Major airport and logistics hub; strong rental demand; townhome/apt development. |
| Western IE Core | Fontana | ~220,000 | ~4,500 | Low–middle | 3–7 | Moderate–high | 1.1–1.4 | None | Rapid growth; big master-planned communities; strong warehouse employment. |
| Western IE Core | Moreno Valley | ~214,000 | ~4,000 | Low–middle | 2–6 | Moderate–high | 1.1–1.4 | None | Amazon air cargo, logistics; relatively affordable newer housing. |
| West Riverside corridor | Corona | ~160,000 | ~4,000 | Middle–upper | 5–9 | Moderate | 1.2–1.5 | None | Commuter suburb for Orange County; strong single-family demand; higher prices. |
| West San Bernardino foothills | Rancho Cucamonga | ~180,000 | ~4,700 | Middle–upper | 6–9 | Low–moderate | 1.2–1.5 | None | Desirable schools, master-planned neighborhoods; strong long-term appreciation record. |
| Southwest Riverside | Temecula | ~115,000 | ~3,000 | Middle–upper | 7–10 | Low–moderate | 1.2–1.6 | None | Wine country; high owner-occupancy; strong family demand, limited infill land. |
| Southwest Riverside | Murrieta | ~117,000 | ~3,300 | Middle | 6–9 | Low–moderate | 1.2–1.6 | None | Bedroom community; large newer housing stock; strong school-driven demand. |
| South/central Riverside | Menifee | ~115,000 | ~3,000 | Middle | 4–8 | Low–moderate | 1.2–1.6 | None | Fast-growing with large new subdivisions; retirement + young families. |
| High Desert | Victorville | ~140,000 | ~1,900 | Low–middle | 2–6 | Moderate–high | 1.0–1.3 | None | Very affordable; strong price sensitivity; reliant on commuter and logistics jobs. |
| High Desert | Hesperia | ~105,000 | ~1,300 | Low–middle | 2–6 | Moderate | 1.0–1.3 | None | Lower cost single-family stock; more land but infrastructure constraints. |
| Coachella Valley | Palm Springs | ~45,000 | ~2,500 | Middle–upper | 4–8 | Moderate | 1.1–1.4 | None | Resort and second-home market; strong STR regs in some areas; volatility with tourism. |
| Coachella Valley | Indio | ~100,000 | ~2,400 | Low–middle | 3–7 | Moderate | 1.1–1.4 | None | Festival economy, growing logistics and service jobs; new subdivisions. |
| Coachella Valley | Palm Desert / La Quinta | ~100,000 combined | ~1,800–2,200 | Middle–upper | 5–9 | Low–moderate | 1.1–1.5 | None | Golf/retirement communities; HOA-heavy; higher HOA and amenity costs. |
| Pass & Hemet–SJ | Beaumont / Banning | ~95,000 combined | ~2,000 | Middle | 3–7 | Low–moderate | 1.3–1.7 | None | Master-planned, newer homes; popular with commuters; some high Mello-Roos taxes. |
| Hemet–San Jacinto | Hemet / San Jacinto | ~135,000 combined | ~3,000 | Low–middle | 2–6 | Moderate | 1.1–1.5 | None | Historically retirement-leaning; more volatility, lower price floor. |
To view all table columns, please open this table on a laptop or desktop screen.
Citizens: income and education profile
- Median household income (MSA-wide): roughly 10–15% below the California median, but with strong internal variation.
- Higher-income pockets:
• Temecula, Murrieta, Corona, Eastvale, Rancho Cucamonga, Chino Hills, La Quinta / Palm Desert. - Lower-income pockets:
• San Bernardino, parts of Riverside, Moreno Valley, High Desert cities, Hemet–San Jacinto, Coachella/Indio core. - Education attainment:
• Share of adults with bachelor’s degree is materially below state average.
• College-educated clusters near University of California Riverside (UCR) area, Loma Linda, Redlands, and some master-planned suburbs. - Demographics:
• Very young age structure relative to coastal metros; large share of families with children.
• High share of Hispanic/Latino residents, especially in western valley floors and Coachella Valley east side. - Homeownership:
• Higher than coastal California, supported by lower price levels and large single-family inventory.
Key economic sectors
- Logistics, warehousing, distribution
• Massive concentration along I‑10, I‑15, SR‑60, around Ontario International Airport, San Bernardino Airport, Moreno Valley.
• Big-box warehouses for e-commerce, retail, and port-linked freight from LA/Long Beach. - Transportation and trade
• Trucking, intermodal rail yards, air cargo; heavy dependence on goods movement cycles. - Healthcare and social assistance
• Regional medical centers in Riverside, Loma Linda, Fontana, Murrieta, Palm Springs corridor. - Education
• UCR, Cal State San Bernardino, community colleges; K‑12 systems are major employers. - Construction
• Large single-family and multifamily pipeline historically; cyclical but structurally important employer. - Tourism and hospitality
• Concentrated in Coachella Valley (resorts, golf, festivals) and mountain/lake destinations (Big Bear, Lake Arrowhead). - Light manufacturing and food processing
• Scattered industrial parks in western submarkets and some desert cities. - Government and defense
• March Air Reserve Base, logistics centers, municipal and county government, corrections.
Housing buying market – supply drivers
- Land availability
• More raw land than coastal counties, especially in High Desert, Hemet–San Jacinto, Pass area.
• Physical constraints: mountains, federal/tribal lands, desert environmental protections limit some directions of growth. - Zoning and regulatory openness
• Generally more permissive single-family zoning than coastal metros; large master-planned tracts.
• Many cities willing to approve greenfield subdivisions and logistics/industrial; infill multifamily still faces neighborhood resistance in some areas.
• State-level mandates (RHNA, ADU laws, SB 9) are pushing higher densities gradually, but implementation uneven. - Impact fees and carrying costs
• Infrastructure and school impact fees significant; some new tracts carry high Mello‑Roos/special assessments, raising effective tax burdens.
• These raise entry prices for new construction relative to older stock. - Construction workforce and costs
• Labor pool shared with greater Southern California; wages lower than LA/OC but still high in absolute terms.
• Materials costs and interest rates have slowed project starts, especially apartments and higher-density product. - Infrastructure capacity
• Highway congestion and limited transit restrict where large-scale new building is politically and financially feasible.
• Sewer/water capacity can be a binding constraint in desert and fringe areas; drought and groundwater management add risk. - Development pattern
• Historically dominated by single-family tract housing; multifamily share is growing but from a low base.
• Many jurisdictions still favor ownership product for fiscal reasons (property tax stability) over lower-revenue rentals.
Housing buying market – demand drivers
- Relative affordability vs coastal California
• Primary demand driver: Inland Empire remains cheaper than Los Angeles and Orange County on both purchase and rent.
• Attracts first-time buyers, working-class households, and families priced out of coastal suburbs. - Inter-county migration
• Net in-migration from LA/OC, especially to Corona, Riverside, Moreno Valley, Temecula, Murrieta, Menifee, Rancho Cucamonga.
• Some net outflow to cheaper states, but still substantial churn from coastal California and international migration streams. - Job growth in logistics and healthcare
• Logistics expansion has generated large numbers of blue- and gray-collar jobs; supports household formation but with modest wages.
• Healthcare and education jobs more stable, supporting mid-income buyers in select submarkets. - Commuter patterns and hybrid work
• Many residents commute to LA/OC for higher-paying jobs; long commutes are partially offset by hybrid/remote arrangements since 2020.
• Southwest Riverside and western San Bernardino foothills particularly popular with such commuters. - Demographics
• Younger population → higher household formation and birth rates than state average; supports ongoing housing demand.
• Multi-generational households common, influencing demand for larger single-family homes and ADUs. - Tourism and second-home demand
• Coachella Valley and mountain/lake areas draw second-home, snowbird, and STR investors; demand is cyclical with travel and income trends. - Interest rates and credit conditions
• Higher mortgage rates have cooled transaction volume; affordability is more sensitive here because incomes are lower than coastal peers.
• Investor demand concentrates on cash-flow-positive areas with lower price points.
Key challenges in the housing market
- Affordability squeeze
• Although cheaper than LA/OC, home prices and rents have outpaced local incomes.
• Many potential buyers remain rent‑burdened and credit‑constrained. - Economic concentration risk
• Heavy reliance on logistics, warehousing, and goods movement exposes region to:
• Automation, reshoring/nearshoring pattern shifts, trade slowdowns, stricter environmental rules for trucks/warehouses. - Infrastructure and congestion
• Long commute times and traffic congestion reduce quality of life; may cap price growth in more distant exurbs.
• Limited regional transit weakens TOD (transit-oriented development) potential compared with coastal metros. - Crime and school quality disparities
• Significant intra‑MSA variation in safety and perceived school quality.
• Higher-crime, lower-scoring districts face weaker buyer demand, higher investor risk, and more volatility. - Environmental and climate risks
• Wildfire risk in foothill and mountain-adjacent areas (Rancho Cucamonga foothills, Pass area, some desert fringes).
• Extreme heat and air quality issues, especially in valley floors and desert subregions.
• Water scarcity and long-run drought concerns in desert and fringe communities. - Municipal fiscal stress
• Some cities (notably San Bernardino historically) have faced fiscal strain, affecting services and perceptions.
• Reliance on development fees and sales-tax-heavy retail/warehouse land uses can be cyclical. - Regulatory uncertainty
• Shifting rules on short-term rentals, warehouse siting, and environmental justice can alter local investment cases.
• State housing mandates may trigger political pushback or legal delays for higher-density projects.
Investment potential by area/region
| Area | Appreciation potential | Risk | Key drivers |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rancho Cucamonga & West San Bernardino foothills (Upland, parts of Fontana) | High | Low–moderate | Desirable schools; limited greenfield land near foothills; strong commuter access; solid owner-occupancy base. |
| Corona & Eastvale | High | Moderate | Proximity to Orange County; strong family demand; constrained land; toll-road and freeway access support long-term values despite congestion. |
| Temecula & Murrieta | High | Moderate | Good schools; lifestyle amenities (wineries, open space); strong owner-occupant demand; somewhat limited new land; long but improving commute patterns via hybrid work. |
| Menifee / Beaumont / Banning corridor | Medium–high | Moderate | Fast population growth; large new subdivisions; more affordable price point; some risk from higher tax assessments and dependence on commuter flows. |
| Riverside (central & good-school neighborhoods) | Medium–high | Moderate | County seat; university/healthcare anchors; infill potential near transit; older stock offers value-add opportunities; pockets with crime/school concerns. |
| Ontario & logistics belt (Ontario, parts of Fontana, Rialto, Moreno Valley) | Medium | Moderate–high | Job growth from logistics and airport activity; strong rental demand; exposure to warehouse cycle, regulatory pushback on truck traffic, and wage stagnation. |
| San Bernardino city | Medium (select neighborhoods) | High | Very low entry prices and high nominal yields; significant crime, governance, and perception risks; values sensitive to economic downturns. |
| High Desert (Victorville, Hesperia, Apple Valley) | Medium | High | Strong affordability and rent-to-price ratios; reliant on commuter, warehouse, and lower-wage service jobs; more vulnerable in recessions; infrastructure and water constraints. |
| Hemet–San Jacinto | Low–medium | High | Low prices and older stock; limited job base; high sensitivity to interest rates and fixed-income/retirement trends; weaker school and amenity perception. |
| Coachella Valley – Palm Desert / La Quinta | Medium–high | Moderate–high | Resort/retirement-driven; attractive for higher-income and second-home buyers; cyclical with markets and tourism; HOA and climate-exposure risk. |
| Coachella Valley – Palm Springs core | Medium | High | Tourism and STR-driven neighborhoods; strong upside in hot cycles but high regulatory and volatility risk; older housing stock with renovation upside. |
| Indio / Coachella (workforce suburbs) | Medium | Moderate–high | Festival economy and logistics/service growth; more affordable than western Coachella Valley; heat, income, and job-mix risks. |
To view all table columns, please open this table on a laptop or desktop screen.
Property Makler © 2026 Contacts T&C About